Sikhs in U.S. say they are at receiving end, post-9/11

REUTERS

Sikhs have been mistaken for terrorists and radicals and continue to suffer after 9/11.

Members of the community are frequently conflused with Muslims and often wind up absorbing the backlash against Islam

Sikhs have been mistaken for terrorists and radicals and continue to suffer after 9/11 terror attacks in the United States, community members feel following the latest attack on an elderly Sikh man in California which is being probed by police as a hate crime.

“This is the latest episode of what Sikhs have been enduring when they are very peace-loving and hard-working citizens of this great country and not members of the al-Qaeda or Islamic State or any other radical group,” member of the Sikh Council of Central California Ike Iqbal Grewal said.

“Sikhs have been mistaken for terrorists and radicals and continue to suffer after 9/11,” he said.

Latest attack

In the latest attack on Sikhs, Amrik Singh Bal (68) of Fresno area in California, was assaulted by two white males in their 20s before dawn on Saturday morning while he was waiting for a ride to work.

He also suffered a broken collar bone in the attack.

Sikhs are frequently conflated with Muslims and often wind up absorbing the backlash against Islam.

‘Nothing new about it’

“There’s nothing new about Sikhs being the targets of violence and intimidation in the United States: Followers of the monotheistic faith, which originated in South Asia in the 15th century, have been at the receiving end of xenophobic intolerance since they began arriving in the Pacific Northwest to fill logging jobs in the early 20th century,” according to Simran Jeet Singh, a senior religion fellow at the Sikh Coalition, a non-profit advocacy group.

That intimidation intensified in the months after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, when a wave of anti-Islamic sentiment washed over the country, leading some to confuse the long beards and turbans worn by many Sikh men as a representation of Islam. Others viewed it simply as an opportunity to attack individuals they perceived as being “un-American,” Washington Post said.

Over 300 cases of violence

According to the Sikh Coalition, there were more than 300 cases of violence and discrimination against U.S. Sikhs in the first month after the 2001 attacks.

“Over the last few weeks, the level of intimidation is worse than it was after September 11,” Harsimran Kaur, the Sikh Coalition’s legal director, told The Post.

“Then, people were angry at the terrorists and now they’re angry at Muslims, anyone who is seen as Muslim, or anyone who is perceived as being ‘other’

“It’s not just a case of mistaken identity. It’s beyond that.”

5 lakh to 7.5 lakh such residents

Although estimates vary because of a lack of census data, the coalition believes 5,00,000 to 7,50,000 Sikhs live in the United States, with about half of that population residing in California.

They are also highly misunderstood by a majority of Americans, according to a 2013 report calledTurban Myths published by the Sikh American Legal Defence and Education Fund and Stanford University.

Many believe Sikhism is Islamic sect

According to the report’s findings, half of the American public associates the turban with Islam and believes that Sikhism is a sect of the religion.

An even larger chunk of the public — 70 per cent — remains unable to identify a Sikh when looking at a picture of one.

Mr. Singh told The Post that portraying hate crimes against U.S. Sikhs as mere cases of mistaken identity is problematic. Not only is an attacker’s motivation often hard to discern, he said, but such categorizations have a way of legitimising the perceived original intent and diminishing the brutality of the crime.

Anti-Islamic statements

The Sikh Coalition’s Ms. Kaur said the backlash against people who are perceived as being non-American has been exacerbated by anti-Islamic statements made by Republican presidential candidates such as Ben Carson and Donald Trump. Mr. Carson has said that the United States should not elect a Muslim president, citing concerns about “different loyalties.”

Mr. Trump has called for a “complete” ban on Muslims entering the U.S.

“Trump’s statements legitimise nativist impulses,” Ms. Kaur said.